Skip to content
Mintnib™

Mintnib › ESAT › Practice papers › Paper 2 › Mathematics 2

ESAT Paper 2 Advanced Mathematics Sample Questions

Five questions from ESAT Paper 2, written to the depth of a full paper, with a worked solution for every one. This is a sample: a full module runs to 27 questions, written for one school at a time. Full timed papers, 27 questions a module, are in ESAT practice, free to start. Part of the ESAT preparation guide.

Schools and organisations we have worked with

Shown with their permission. Not endorsements. See all

Question 1

For some x>0 it is given that x2·x−1/3x4/3=3. Correct to 3 significant figures, what does x−2 equal?

Difficulty: ★★★☆☆ Target Time: 90 s Tests: N/A

Key Idea (💡): Powers of the same base combine by adding indices when they are multiplied and by subtracting when they are divided, and those rules hold for negative and fractional indices exactly as they do for whole ones. Once a whole expression has collapsed to a single power of the unknown, the equation is solved by undoing that power, after which any other power of the same unknown follows by direct substitution. A negative index is a reciprocal, never a negative number.

ESAT specification (UAT-UK): MM1.1

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: C. 0.00137

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Collapse the left side to a single power of x

Powers of one base multiply by ADDING indices, so the numerator combines first:
x2·x−1/3=x5/3
Dividing by the denominator subtracts its index:
x5/3x4/3=x1/3
Run in a single pass the indices total 2−13−43=13, so the condition in the stem is simply x1/3=3.

2. Solve for x

x1/3 is the cube root of x, and the stem fixes x>0, so raising both sides to the power 3 is safe and leaves no second solution to check:
x=33=27

3. Evaluate the requested power

A negative index means a reciprocal, not a negative value:
x−2=1x2=1272=1729=0.00137
to 3 significant figures, which is the form the stem asks for.

Sanity check

Put x=27 back into the left side. Its indices are the same chain as before, 2−13−43=13, so the expression is 271/3, and the cube root of 27 is 3, as the stem requires. Since x=27>1, every negative power of x has to be a small positive fraction, so the two whole number options were never candidates.

The key is 0.00137.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • A. 0.0185 · Index treated as a multiplier
    After reaching x=27 the index was read as a multiplier rather than as a power, giving 12×27=154. An index of −2 means one over x raised to the power 2, so the denominator is 272=729, and not 2×27=54.
  • B. 0.111 · Root not undone
    The condition x1/3=3 was read as x=3, with the cube root left undone, and then 3−2=19 was evaluated. Undoing the cube root comes first: raising both sides to the power 3 gives x=33=27, which is not 3.
  • D. 27.0 · Intermediate value reported
    The index chain was carried out correctly as far as x=27, and that value was reported. The stem asks for x−2 and not for x, so 27 is the intermediate result rather than the answer, and a negative power of a number larger than 1 is always smaller than 1.
  • E. 729 · Negative index ignored
    The minus sign in the index was dropped, so x2=272=729 was evaluated instead of x−2. A negative index inverts the power rather than negating it, so the value wanted is the reciprocal of 729.
  • F. 0.481 · Root applied to the given number instead of undone
    The condition x1/3=3 was read as an instruction to take the cube root of 3, so x was recorded as 31/3 and the requested power came out as (31/3)−2=3−2/3. The cube root is what has already been done to x, so it is undone by raising both sides to the power 3 rather than by applying it a second time: x=33=27, and x−2=1729=0.00137.
  • G. -0.00137 · Minus sign used to negate as well as to invert
    The minus in the index was made to do two jobs at once, taking the reciprocal and turning the value negative as well: −1272=−1729. It does one of them. x−2 means 1x2, and x=27 is positive, so every power of it is positive too and the value is 1729=0.00137.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Treating the division as though it removed the denominator's index by addition rather than by subtraction. The chain 2−13−43=13 only lands on 1/3 because 4/3 is taken away; add it instead and the left side becomes a power of x that no whole number solves, which is the clearest warning available that the sign went the wrong way.

Takeaway (📌):
One base means one index. Total the indices first and the whole stem shrinks to x1/3=3; from there x=27, and the power requested is arithmetic rather than algebra. The minus sign is the last thing to apply, and it inverts.

Question 2

Rationalise the denominator of 17−1117+11 and simplify fully. What is the value of the result, correct to 3 significant figures?

Difficulty: ★★★☆☆ Target Time: 85 s Tests: N/A

Key Idea (💡): A denominator built from a sum of two surds is cleared by multiplying above and below by its conjugate, because a conjugate pair multiplies out as a difference of two squares and leaves a rational number behind. When the numerator is that same conjugate, the multiplication squares it, so the cross term of the expansion survives and the simplified quotient still carries a surd on top. Dividing by the rational denominator then means dividing every term of the numerator, not the surd term alone.

ESAT specification (UAT-UK): MM1.2

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: C. 0.108

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Multiply above and below by the conjugate of the denominator

The denominator is 17+11, whose conjugate is 17−11. Multiplying numerator and denominator by the same quantity leaves the value unchanged:
17−1117+11=(17−11)2(17)2−(11)2=(17−11)217−11
The denominator is now the rational number 6.

2. Expand the numerator, then divide every term of it

(17−11)2=17−21711+11=28−2187
so the quotient is 28−21876. Both 17 and 11 are odd, so 28 and 6 are both even and the factor 2 comes out of the whole numerator and out of the denominator together:
28−21876=2(14−187)2×3=14−1873
The factor cancels out of the whole bracket, not out of one term of it.

3. Put a number to the exact form

187 is close to 13.7, and it is smaller than 14, since 14 is the arithmetic mean of 17 and 11 while 187 is their geometric mean. The numerator is therefore positive, and to 3 significant figures the fraction 14−1873 is 0.108.

Sanity check

Take 17≈4.12 and 11≈3.32. The original quotient is then roughly 4.12−3.32 over 4.12+3.32, which is close to 0.108. The value also has to be positive and below 1, because 17−11 is the smaller of two positive quantities and 17+11 is the larger, and it is.

The key is 0.108.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • A. 9.22 · Cross-term sign slip
    The cross term was expanded with the wrong sign, so (17−11)2 was written as 17+2187+11=28+2187. Dividing by the correct denominator 6 then gives about 9.22, which is greater than 1, although the quotient in the stem has the smaller of the two positive quantities on top and so cannot exceed 1. Squaring a difference subtracts the cross term.
  • B. 4.78 · Partial cancellation
    From the correct 28−21876 the factor 2 was cancelled against 6 but applied to the surd term only, leaving 28−1873, which is about 4.78. The whole numerator is being divided, so 28 has to be halved to 14 as well.
  • D. 0.0232 · Denominator added instead of differenced
    The denominator was multiplied out as 17×17+11×11=17+11=28 rather than as the difference of two squares 17−11=6. That gives 28−218728≈0.0232, which is smaller than the true value of about 0.108. A conjugate pair multiplies to a difference of squares, never to a sum.
  • E. -3.56 · Second square subtracted in the expansion
    The second square was subtracted rather than added while expanding the numerator: 17−2187−11=6−2187. Dividing by 6 gives about −3.56, a negative value, although 17−11 and 17+11 are both positive and so their quotient cannot be negative. Both squares are added when a bracket is squared; only the cross term changes sign.
  • F. 0.134 · Conjugate multiplied into the denominator only
    The conjugate was multiplied into the bottom of the fraction but not into the top, so 17−1117+11 was recorded as 17−116. Multiplying the denominator alone changes the value of the quotient, so the same factor has to go into the numerator, where it squares 17−11 and produces 28−2187. The quotient is therefore 28−21876≈0.108.
  • G. 2.39 · Cross term counted once
    Squaring the numerator produced a single copy of the cross term, so (17−11)2 was written as 28−187 and then divided by 6. Expanding (17−11)(17−11) gives −187 twice, once from each bracket, so the numerator is 28−2187 and the value is 0.108.
  • H. 0.463 · Surds collected under one root
    Top and bottom were each collapsed into a single surd, as though 17−11=6 and 17+11=28, which leaves 628. A root does not spread across a sum or a difference: 17−11 squares to 28−2187 and not to 6. Clearing the denominator with the conjugate leaves 28−21876≈0.108.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Multiplying numerator and denominator by the denominator itself instead of by its conjugate. That produces (17−11)(17+11)(17+11)2=628+2187, which still has a surd underneath, so nothing has been rationalised and the work has to start again.

Takeaway (📌):
When the top and the bottom of a surd fraction are conjugates of one another, one multiplication does everything: the denominator collapses to the integer 6 and the numerator becomes the perfect square 28−2187. Divide every term of that numerator by the integer, then estimate the surd once to choose between the options.

Question 3

The equation x2+8x+2=k has a repeated root. Find the value of k.

Difficulty: ★★★☆☆ Target Time: 90 s Tests: N/A

Key Idea (💡): A horizontal line y=k crosses a curve exactly where the curve's expression equals k, so the points of contact are the real roots of x2+8x+2=k. Exactly one point of contact means a repeated root, and a repeated root means a discriminant of zero. Completing the square says the same thing in a different language: an upward parabola written as a square plus a constant reaches that constant and never goes below it, so the one height a horizontal line can touch without crossing is that constant. Both routes must give the same k, and using one to check the other is the cheapest guard against a sign slip.

ESAT specification (UAT-UK): MM1.3

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: E. -14

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Complete the square

Halve the coefficient of x: half of 8 is 4, so the bracket is (x+4)2. Expanding that bracket introduces an extra 16 that the original expression does not have, so the same amount has to come back off:

y=(x+4)2−16+2

The two constants collect to −16+2=−14. A square is never negative and (x+4)2 is 0 at x=−4, so the lowest point of the curve is (−4,−14) and its least y-value is −14.

2. Set the discriminant to zero

The line y=k meets the curve wherever x2+8x+2=k. In standard form that is

x2+8x+2−k=0

so, with a=1, b=8 and c=2−k, the discriminant is

D=(8)2−4(1)(2−k)=64−4(2−k)

One point of contact is a repeated root, which needs D=0:

64−4(2−k)=0⟹2−k=644=16⟹k=2−16=−14

3. Check the value

The two routes agree, which is the check worth doing: the completed square puts the least value of the curve at −14, and the discriminant puts the repeated root at the same height. Substituting x=−4 into x2+8x+2 gives −14 directly, so the line y=−14 touches the curve at (−4,−14). Any k above −14 gives D>0 and two crossings; any k below −14 gives D<0 and no crossing at all.

The key is −14.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • A. 18 · Sign error completing the square
    A sign slip on the correction term: adding 16 instead of subtracting it gives (x+4)2+16+2, a constant of 18. Substituting x=−4 into x2+8x+2 settles it, since the height of the curve there is −14.
  • B. 2 · Correction term never subtracted
    Writes the completed square as (x+4)2+2 and stops, never taking off the 16 that the bracket introduces. That leaves the constant at 2, which is the height of the curve at x=0 rather than its least value −14.
  • C. -62 · Coefficient of x not halved
    Squares the whole coefficient of x instead of half of it: (x+8)2−64+2 gives a constant of −62. Halving is what makes the bracket reproduce the 8x term, since (x+8)2 expands with an x coefficient of 16 and not 8.
  • D. 14 · Sign error rearranging before the discriminant
    Moves k to the wrong side, rearranging to x2+8x+2+k=0 instead of subtracting it. The discriminant then reads (8)2−4(2+k), and setting that to zero gives 2+k=16, so k=14. The curve's least value is −14, so a line at height 14 is not the one that touches it.
  • F. 56 · Discriminant taken before k was brought in
    The discriminant was formed from the curve exactly as printed, (8)2−4(2), so k never entered the equation at all. The line has to be in it first: x2+8x+2=k rearranges to x2+8x+2−k=0, whose discriminant is (8)2−4(2−k). Setting that to zero gives 2−k=16, so k=−14, the height of the curve at x=−4.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Stopping at the constant term. The completed square form is (x+4)2−16+2, and the correction −16 has to be carried through: quoting 2 gives the height of the curve at x=0, not its least value −14. Substituting x=−4 back into x2+8x+2 catches it in one line.

Takeaway (📌):
For a curve y=x2+bx+c the horizontal line y=k touches it at exactly one point when k is the height of the vertex, and that height is the constant left after completing the square. Halve the coefficient of x, square it, subtract: 2−16=−14. The discriminant gives the same number and takes longer.

Question 4

The line y=x−4 cuts the curve y=4x2−6x−3 twice. Find the horizontal separation of the two intersection points, correct to 3 significant figures.

Difficulty: ★★★★☆ Target Time: 90 s Tests: N/A

Key Idea (💡): Where a line meets a curve both equations give the same y, so eliminating y by substitution leaves a single quadratic in x whose roots are the x-coordinates of the intersections. The quadratic formula places those roots symmetrically either side of −b2a, so the gap between them depends only on b2−4ac and the leading coefficient, never on where the centre happens to sit.

ESAT specification (UAT-UK): MM1.4

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: F. 1.44

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Substitute the line into the curve

Both equations give y, so at an intersection

x−4=4x2−6x−3

Taking every term of the line across, the x term and the constant together, leaves one quadratic:

4x2−7x+1=0

Its x coefficient is −7 and its constant is 1.

2. Evaluate the discriminant

With leading coefficient 4,

(−7)2−4(4)(1)=33

It is positive, which is consistent with the two crossings the question describes.

3. Take the difference of the roots

x=−(−7)±332(4), so the two roots differ by

2332(4)=334=1.44 to 3 significant figures.

The centre the two roots sit either side of cancels in that subtraction and never has to be worked out.

Sanity check

The roots are near 0.157 and 1.59, which are roughly 1.44 apart. Between them 4x2−7x+1 is negative and outside them it is positive, as a quadratic with a positive x2 coefficient and two real roots must be.

The key is 1.44.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • A. 2.29 · Solved the wrong equation
    The line was left out of the working and the curve's own x-intercepts were measured instead. 4x2−6x−3=0 has discriminant (−6)2−4(4)(−3)=84, so its two roots are 844=2.29 apart to 3 significant figures. Those are the points where the curve crosses the x-axis, not the points where it crosses y=x−4.
  • B. 2.46 · Constant term of the line left behind
    The x term of the line was taken across but its constant was not, leaving 4x2−7x−3=0, whose constant is still −3 where the substitution makes it 1. Its discriminant is (−7)2−4(4)(−3)=97, giving 974=2.46 to 3 significant figures. The constant of the line crosses over with its x term, in the same move.
  • C. 1.12 · x term of the line left behind
    The constant of the line was taken across but its x term was not, leaving 4x2−6x+1=0, whose x coefficient is still −6 where the substitution makes it −7. Its discriminant is (−6)2−4(4)(1)=20, giving 204=1.12 to 3 significant figures. The x term of the line crosses over with its constant, in the same move.
  • D. 2.02 · Sign error in the discriminant
    The 4ac part of the discriminant was added rather than subtracted: (−7)2+4(4)(1)=65 was used in place of (−7)2−4(4)(1)=33, which gives 654=2.02 to 3 significant figures. The constant of 4x2−7x+1=0 is 1, and it enters b2−4ac carrying its own sign.
  • E. 0.718 · Only one root's offset from the centre taken
    The quadratic formula puts the roots at −(−7)±332(4), and the 332(4) that each root sits away from the centre was reported as the separation. There is one root on each side of that centre, so the distance between them is twice the offset: 2332(4)=334=1.44 to 3 significant figures. The two roots are near 0.157 and 1.59, and the gap between those is the quantity the stem asks for.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Taking the x term of the line across but leaving its constant where it started, which collects the equation as 4x2−7x−3=0 instead of 4x2−7x+1=0. The constant is then −3 rather than 1, the discriminant reads 97 rather than 33, and every line after that is answering a different question. Both terms of the line have to be subtracted from the curve before the discriminant means anything.

Takeaway (📌):
For ax2+bx+c=0 with two real roots, the roots sit at −b2a plus or minus b2−4ac2a, so the distance between them is b2−4ac|a|. The centre cancels in the subtraction and never has to be worked out.

Question 5

A sequence satisfies un+1=un+92, with sixth term 12. Find u1.

Difficulty: ★★★☆☆ Target Time: 85 s Tests: N/A

Key Idea (💡): A first order recurrence can be run in either direction. Rearranging un+1=f(un) to make un the subject produces an inverse rule, and applying that rule repeatedly walks the sequence back towards its starting value. The number of applications is the difference between the two indices, not the number of terms named. A recurrence of this shape also has a fixed point L, found by solving L=L+92, and the difference between a term and L is divided by 2 at every forward step, so it is multiplied by 2 at every backward one.

ESAT specification (UAT-UK): MM2.1

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: B. 105

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Invert the rule

Make the earlier term the subject:
un+1=un+92⟹2un+1=un+9⟹un=2un+1−9
This rule takes any term and returns the one before it, so it can be applied as many times as needed.

2. Find the fixed point

A term equal to L would reproduce itself, so L=L+92, giving 2L=L+9, then (2−1)L=9 and L=9. Writing every term as L plus a difference is what turns the chain into one multiplication.

3. Walk back from u6 to u1

The difference between the given term and the fixed point is u6−L=12−(9)=3. Each application of the inverse rule multiplies that difference by 2, and the number of applications is the difference of the indices, 6−1=5:
u1=L+25×(3)=9+(96)=105

Check it forwards through the original rule: 105+92=57, which is u2, and a further 4 forward steps return u6=12 as stated.

The key is 105.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • A. 9 · Fixed point mistaken for the term
    The fixed point was quoted as the answer. Solving L=L+92 gives 2L=L+9, so (2−1)L=9 and L=9. That is the value the sequence approaches as it runs forwards, not its first term. If u1 were 9 then every term would equal 9, and the sixth term would be 9 rather than the stated 12.
  • C. 33 · Backward steps undercounted
    The inverse rule un=2un+1−9 was applied two times too few, stopping at u3=33 instead of u1. The gap from index 6 to index 1 is 5, so two further applications are still owed.
  • D. 96 · Fixed point not restored
    The multiply-by-2 shortcut was used but the fixed point was never added back on. 25×(3)=96 is the difference between u1 and the fixed point 9, not u1 itself, so L still has to be added to it.
  • E. 57 · Index gap off by one
    Only 4 applications of the inverse rule were made, so the walk stopped one index short at u2=57. Going from index 6 to index 1 needs 6−1=5 applications, one more than were made, and it is the subscripts that fix that count rather than the terms written down.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Working with the difference from the fixed point and then forgetting to put the fixed point back. The power of 2 scales the difference, 25×(3)=96, and that is a distance rather than a term: the first term is 9+(96)=105.

Takeaway (📌):
For un+1=un+ck, solve L=L+ck for the fixed point first. The difference from L is divided by k at every forward step and multiplied by k at every backward one, so u1=L+km(u1+m−L) replaces the whole chain of substitutions. Here that reads u1=9+25(12−(9))=105.

Where to go next

For individual preparation. These questions are free for a candidate working on their own. They are not licensed for a school, college or tutoring provider to print and run with a class, to republish or resell, or to fold into a course sold by another provider. A school sitting a timed mock with a class needs a paper written for its own candidates and used nowhere else: a commissioned pack, which comes with mark schemes and a syllabus reference.

Keep going